Greetings again,
Um, Civileme, if you are listening - do you have any comments to add
about the kernel compilation issues? I can't seem to find any other references
relating to this....
Regards,
David
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 10:11, you wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:16 AM -0600 David Oberbeck
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I discovered that the kernel will still not compile,
> > somehow the configuration header files are still fscked up. Well, to
> > be more precise - as you mentioned - the kernel compiles, but the
> > module compilation fails.
> >
> > Sorry, don't have a solution for this one, still an issue with
> > kernel 2.4.12-3 for me (anyone else have any suggestions?)
>
> For me the problem seemed to be in linking for only some (maybe just a few)
> of the modules. I had to go back to 2.4.9 to compile/link without this
> problem.
>
> On any given system, there's a good chance that if only a few modules have
> problems, they wouldn't be needed anyway. And if a module that failed is
> needed, its source can be downloaded and compiled separately.
>
> I didn't have a chance to try this... 'make -k modules' This will tell
> make to ignore errors as much as it can and go on. You will probably want
> to review the make output to see just what problems there were, and see if
> you can live with them. So use:
>
> make -k modules 2>&1 | tee file.to.capture.output
>
> then after it's done have a look at file.to.capture.output
> I didn't try this, but if you do I'm interested to know if it works.
>
> Karl Cunningham
--
"Entropy Requires No Maintenance"
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
