On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Oberbeck wrote: > Michael, > > Actually, on a previous thread there were a (large) number > of reasons, including printers, emulators, switches, routers... > a whole bestiary of equipment which does not speak ssh > but telnet. Not to mention a plethora of platorms, and the > conditions under which an unencrypted telnet can be used > with minimal risk. > > See previous thread 'Arrrgh - Telnet Problems (Authentication?)' > for your edification (and a solution). > > Regards, > David > > P.S. skidley (Chad?) - apology accepted. > > On Thursday 15 November 2001 10:05, you wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:52:42 -0400 (AST) > > > > skidley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like to apologize for saying that someone who uses telnet is > > > stupid. There are legitimate uses for telnet and that was really > > > inappropriate for me to make such a comment. It's just I've heard it > > > > said > > > > > so often to stay away from telnet. > > > > > > skidley > > > > Hum, I can't think of any legitimate uses for telnet that ssh can not > > do. > > Yes my name is Chad. How'd you know, maybe by Linux User #, because I have skidley set in PINE.
Chad Y. -- Linux User #195191
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
