I haver also tried RedHat 7.2 and it is more a system for office than
home.
Install the net, mail and so one is possible, but not as easy as
Mandrake. Tv
card could be installed , but using scripts and command line, as in
Mandrake
7.2.

About compiling with mandrake, the key is install the appropriate libs;
I have
compiled lots of packages; sometimes the particularities of the
directory
systems, that still differs from one to other distribution; is becose
those
problems that an standarization of the files and directories structure
should be
very insteresting for the success of linux.

To to that I made a recommended installation but during it I choose
selection of
packages, installing the gcc compiler and the most used libs. For
specifical
packages compilation I had to look into the configure file or ask for
help at
the author of the package.

I hope this could help

Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)

----- Mensaje Original -----
Remitente: Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Domingo, Enero 13, 2002 9:03 pm
Asunto: Re: [expert] redhat vs mandrake
> > bascule
> >
> > > The only use I get from RedHat is that
> > > the compiler seems to work when I want to
> > > install and run wxGTKwindows libraries,
> > > and audacity audio editing software,
> > > everything else in RedHat is broken,
> > > but on my RedHat it is KDE's Dcopserver
> > > that I cannot seem to fix, I can't even log
> > > into kde session, I have to use gnome, can't
> > > even run any kde apps! Bugger. (scuse my french)
> 
> 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to