Praedor Tempus wrote: > The reason I have resisted straight kernel.org kernels > (up to now) is that the mandrake kernels integrate > more features than the simple kernels...like the grsec > settings in 2.4.17 that are not there in the > kernel.org kernel. There are other niceties too. > > As for kernel-2.3.13, I had a working Mandrake 2.4.13, > not a simple kernel.org kernel. I lost it, however, > when I accidently trashed my system a couple days ago > and had to reinstall 8.1 from scratch. > > I am trying a straight kernel.org 2.4.17 kernel, > mostly with success, but am still fiddling with > settings to clean it up. > > praedor > > --- mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>did you look here? >> >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ >> >>it has kernel 2.4.13 >> >>Mike >> >> >>>Want to buy your Pack or Services from >>> > MandrakeSoft? > >>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com >> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > http://auctions.yahoo.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com >
Couldn't you save the configurationg of a happy Mandrake kernel that you customized and load that into the configuration of a source tarball kernel? Wouldn't that still provide a happy medium? You can also do a "diff" between the configuration file of a happy mandrake kernel and the configuration file of a source kernel file? Just a thought. HTH altoine
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
