On Monday 25 February 2002 10:01 pm, you wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:12:41 -0800 > > James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:16:46 -0500 > > > > gnerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm with you, Hoyt, re: the 486 version of Mandrake. There's still a > > > lot of legacy hardware out there that could use the Mandrake "ease of > > > use" touch with optimized performance. They'd probably have to ditch X > > > and go with some kind of SVGA solution (or maybe port one of the PDA > > > Xes), but IMO it would be worthwhile. > > >
There's always TinyX. I've used it on a 4MB 486 laptop and a 16MB 386 (see LinuxFormat Dec/Jan issues). > > Um...guys? there is a version of Mandrake that came out for the 486. It was > released as Mandrake 7.0 about a year or so ago. Sure. i have it, but it's -- 7.0 -- -- Hoyt http://www.maximumhoyt.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
