On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:37:57 -0500 Hoyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> On Monday 25 February 2002 10:01 pm, you wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:12:41 -0800 > > > > James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:16:46 -0500 > > > > > > gnerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm with you, Hoyt, re: the 486 version of Mandrake. There's still > > > > a lot of legacy hardware out there that could use the Mandrake "ease > > > > of use" touch with optimized performance. They'd probably have to > > > > ditch X and go with some kind of SVGA solution (or maybe port one of > > > > the PDA Xes), but IMO it would be worthwhile. > > > > > > > There's always TinyX. I've used it on a 4MB 486 laptop and a 16MB 386 (see > LinuxFormat Dec/Jan issues). > > > > > > Um...guys? there is a version of Mandrake that came out for the 486. It > > was released as Mandrake 7.0 about a year or so ago. > > Sure. i have it, but it's -- 7.0 -- > > -- > Hoyt well....yeah.... but if all you've got is a 486 at least it's Mandrake. I don't know if I could ever go back to anything earlier then 8.1 since I've been using it. -- daRcmaTTeR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Registered Linux User 182496 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:05pm up 6 days, 4:41, 3 users, load average: 0.38, 0.41, 0.35
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
