For my money I would use XFS every time. Its fast an recovers quickly from resets (damn that gnomemeeting junk ;) Its a problem with floppy boot disks though as the drivers are on the large size. But bootable CDs are fine for rescues.
Dave Sherman wrote: >On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 21:19, Mark Williamson wrote: > >>Which is better choice ext3 or reiserfs for the file system? any >>issues with NFS when using either of the file system? We are running >>here with ext3, but nothing is being said which would be a better >>choice.. >> > >I don't know if there are outstanding NFS issues with ReiserFS, but I >can tell you from personal experience, Reiser is quite a bit faster than >Ext3 on the systems I have tried. The only reason I would use Ext3 is if >I already had the system on Ext2 and wanted to convert it without doing >a backup/restore of the partition. Starting with a fresh install or new >partition, I would use Reiser. >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
