I used Reiser for a couple months it was very fast and I only had one small (really aggravaitng ) problem. You cant play mp3 off reisers with some mp3 players. Its even noted on the reiser home page. That was enough for me to rethink my filesystem next time I updated my system.
Luke Nick Thompson wrote: > For my money I would use XFS every time. Its fast an recovers quickly > from resets (damn that gnomemeeting junk ;) Its a problem with floppy > boot disks though as the drivers are on the large size. But bootable CDs > are fine for rescues. > > Dave Sherman wrote: > >> On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 21:19, Mark Williamson wrote: >> >>> Which is better choice ext3 or reiserfs for the file system? any >>> issues with NFS when using either of the file system? We are running >>> here with ext3, but nothing is being said which would be a better >>> choice.. >>> >> >> I don't know if there are outstanding NFS issues with ReiserFS, but I >> can tell you from personal experience, Reiser is quite a bit faster than >> Ext3 on the systems I have tried. The only reason I would use Ext3 is if >> I already had the system on Ext2 and wanted to convert it without doing >> a backup/restore of the partition. Starting with a fresh install or new >> partition, I would use Reiser. >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com > -- Luke Vandervort 1Ti 4:8 For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
