On Sat Jan 25, 2003 at 03:21:52PM -0400, Adolfo Bello wrote: > On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 14:30, Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Fri Jan 24, 2003 at 11:15:03PM -0600, jerry wrote: > > > You don't need a my.cnf. I don't use one (never have) and have never > > had a problem because I don't have one. Mind you, MySQL may not be > > optimized without it, but it isn't necessary for it to run. > This is true as long as you don't need transactions, rollbacks, commits, > referencial integrity (in version 4.0.9) and so on. > > Without /etc/my.cnf you are restricted to MYISAM and BDB tables.
True, but last I checked, we haven't touched MySQL 4.x yet so it's a moot point until we move to 4.x (ie. cooker has 3.23.54a which should be updated to .55 shortly). Actually, speaking of which, has anyone used 4.x at all? Any initial reactions to it compared to 3.x? -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
msg64955/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
