On Sat Jan 25, 2003 at 09:20:41PM -0400, Adolfo Bello wrote: > > True, but last I checked, we haven't touched MySQL 4.x yet so it's a > > moot point until we move to 4.x (ie. cooker has 3.23.54a which should > > be updated to .55 shortly). > > > > Actually, speaking of which, has anyone used 4.x at all? Any initial > > reactions to it compared to 3.x? > > I really like 4.0.9-gamma. I upgraded from 3.23.54 when referencial > integrity was totally supported. UPDATE-DELETE-RESTRICT-CASCADE are > working just fine. > > I recommend you to take a detailed look at this version. Stability > reports sound good.
Ahhh... but that implies I actually have time to do that. =) Trust me, I'd love to take a look at it... I use MySQL quite heavily so better stability and performance is good for me... plus I'd like to make sure that Anthill works with MySQL 4.x. I just have no time to do it, which is why I asked... to see if when/if I do get a few days of spare time if I should actually look into it, without wasting my time on it. Thanks tho... I'll definitely add it to my TODO list. Is there any big issues migrating data from a 3.x database to a 4.x database? Is it pretty much a drop in upgrade or do you have to do some data conversion first? -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
msg65000/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
