On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:46 pm, lorne wrote: Okay,
Maybe a small breakthrough. I transfered the same file both ways. I've not even analyzed it yet, but.... there is 25% more frames total (without subtracting arps or anything) in the slow than the fast! Not sure yet what else I'll dig up. > On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:27 am, David Rankin wrote: > > Mates: > > > > Here is another clue that may help get to the bottom of this. Back in > > the 7.2 days when Samba 2.0X, 2.1X was comming out, the slow transfer > > issue appeared with Win98 transfers. The 2 gig limit was also there. The > > slow transfer from win to mdk was discussed as a "packet fragmentation" > > or "rabbit pellet packet fragmentation" problem by Civileme. The Samba > > folks also worked the issue. The issue was evidently resolved for win98, > > but the same type of problem could have reared its head again. > > > > I tried to do a archive search for this issue, but for some reason > > the archive search daemon would not connect. Anyway, I would suggest an > > expert archive search for "packet fragmentation" or "rabbit pellet" to > > get the history of the issue. M$ may have changed smb just enough to > > recreate this condition and the Samba folks may have some more work to > > do. > > Very good point. I noticed an awful lot of 1514 frames. Let me go back and > take another look see. I might have missed something. > > BAH... I'm going to do another trace. I'll make it more controlled. Using > the exact same file so I can make a better comparison. I'm not seeing > anything the jumps out at me. 1514 frames though. ?? I'll write back. > > > -- > > David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. > > RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC > > 510 Ochiltree Street > > Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 > > (936) 715-9333 > > (936) 715-9339 fax > > -- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "lorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:45 AM > > Subject: Re: [expert] Slow SMB file transfers to XP` > > > > > On Monday 01 September 2003 08:10 pm, Michael Viron wrote: > > > > Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in > > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and > > > > possibly > > > > > > in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321098 . > > > > > > > > You may also want to try running regedit to do the following: > > > > > > > > go to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/Microsoft/Windows/Current > > > > Version/Explorer/RemoteComputer/NameSpace" in the registry > > > > > > > > remove {D6277990-4C6A-11CF-8D87-00AA0060F5BF} . > > > > > > First I apologize for not reporting what I found yesterday. I had > > > already tried the top two things to no avail yesterday. I tried > > > removing the above key and it made no difference at all. As we speak > > > I'm transferring 285MB > > > > of > > > > > data from the Linux box to the XP box and it has been 8 minutes so far > > > and > > > > my > > > > > guess is that it will take another 9 - 10 minutes. If I do it from my > > > > linux > > > > > server and copy it to the xp box, it will blast over in about 2 minutes > > > or less!! > > > > > > > The above key instructs windows to look for scheduled tasks on the pc > > > > in question (which may slow done browsing by at least 30s). > > > > > > > > Also take a look at > > > > http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Software/Operating_Systems/Wind > >ow s/Windows_XP/?tc=1 > > > > > , which includes about a hundred windows xp related > > > > > > > sites of tips / tweaks / guides and howtos. > > > > > > > > Just some thoughts, > > > > > > Thanks a bunch Michael. I've started looking them over. As you know, it > > > is somewhat like looking for a needle in a haystack. I'm home sick > > > today, so I'll do some more "googling" to see if someone has come up > > > with a "fix" > > > > for > > > > > this. > > > > > > If I forgot to mention, SP1 does NOT make a difference for my > > > particular problem. Also, I'm using mdk 9.1 with out of the box Samba. > > > Nothing "special". I'm running 100Bt Half duplex hub. XP to XP fast. XP > > > to ME > > > > fast. > > > > > Linux to XP fast. XP to Linux slooooowwwww. ??? This one has me > > > stumped. > > > > What > > > > > is interesting.... is I swear when I was running older versions of > > > > Mandrake I > > > > > don't recall this slowness. So even though I've bashed XP, perhaps it > > > has been premature. I just thought of this. > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Michael Viron > > > > Core Systems Group > > > > Simple End User Linux > > > > > > > > At 04:30 PM 9/1/2003 -0700, you wrote: > > > > >On Monday 01 September 2003 03:48 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > > > > >> Greg Meyer wrote: > > > > >> >On Monday 01 September 2003 03:13 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > > > > >> >>I was the one who asked the question about slow transfers using > > > > Samba. > > > > > > >> >>I asked on this list and on the newbie list. Still have not > > > > received > > > > > > >> >>any answers resolving the issue. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>When a transfer to or from a Samba box is initiated from a > > > > >> >> Win2000 > > > > box > > > > > > >> >>it flies. When the same transfer is initiated from a Samba box > > > > >> >> to either another Samba box, or to a Win2000 box, it crawls at > > > > >> >> around > > > > 1/3 > > > > > > >> >>the speed of the Win2000 initiated transfer. Is this expected > > > > >> >> behavior? > > > > >> > > > > > >> >I think the op of this thread had the slowness going the other > > > > >> > way. Samba to XP is fast, while XP to samba is fast. In any > > > > >> > case, it always seems to be a problem with the configuration of > > > > >> > the windows machines, not the samba machines. > > > > >> > > > > >> Windows to Samba was only half of my comment. An incorrect > > > > >> Windows configuration doesn't explain a slow Samba to Samba > > > > >> transfer. > > > > > > > > > >I would agree from smb to smb, but I really don't believe this is an > > > > >"incorrect windows configuration" issue. There is a fundamental > > > > > issue > > > > that > > > > > > > I believe Microsoft has done to deliberately break or slow samba. I > > > > may > > > > > > > be wrong, but I've not seen a solution yet. I did read somewhere > > > > > that > > > > you > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > >longer need netbios resolution for XP to work, but I don't think > > > > > this > > > > is > > > > > > > the problem. If anything that would help without a wins server. ?? > > > > > > > > > >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > > > > >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >-- - ---- > > > > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > > > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
