-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I rarely see spam anymore, since going to postfix, procmail, and spamd all in 
combination.  Anything spamd identifies as spam gets /dev/nulled.  The only 
stuff I see (rarely) are messages that get past spamassassin and into my 
inbox, thus it is only messages that spamd fails to detect that I end up with 
and run sa-learn on.

praedor

On Monday 20 October 2003 11:41 am, Bryan Phinney wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2003 11:47 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > Simple question.  Originally I used spamassassin directly from kmail
> > (spamc to work through spamd).  Since it was I who was making the call I
> > could assume that whenever I did a "sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur"
> > that whatever was learned was used in subsequent spam analysis.
[...]
> BTW, it does little good to have SA try to learn on messages that it
> correctly classified.  It already got those.  You should only have it learn
> on messages where it got it wrong, either spam that was not classified as
> spam or false positives that were classified as spam but were not.   Keep
> in mind that you are trying to get it to learn to do what it doesn't do
> better, not trying to get it to learn to do what it already does right
> better.

- -- 
"Our ship is in the hands of pilots who are steering directly under full sail 
for a rock.  The whole crew may see this course to violate our liberties in 
full view if they look the right way."
- --Samuel Adams, 1771
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lBI5aKr9sJYeTxgRAhMaAKCKrCJuEzRMrHXR/C1MXRytYFvq+gCdGxq3
11EmH6ygEszqtPpE3w7+ddo=
=Ft8M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to