From: sig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Discussion about Exupery a native code compiler."<[email protected]> To: "Discussion about Exupery a native code compiler."<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Introducing Huemul
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:23:27 +0300

I want to
overthrow this concept, and move almost all VM functionality into
smalltalk without losing speed, and by gaining a flexibility and
scalability at same time.

Here I see things a little different. I mean that is a good thing to hope for in the future, but I'm a fan of smaller bite-sized chunks. I think a good first step would be to be to (1) make a DSL-style system in Smalltalk for creating assembly code (think Slang but without the limitations) and (2) going right to the assembly, no translations to more-limited-then-asm intermediates like (especially) C.

I'm not sure how much of this has been done already, but I think we have a lot of options today (e.g. Pepsi, maybe some code from Exupery and maybe Huemul) to explore this.

_________________________________________________________________
Like the way Microsoft Office Outlook works? You’ll love Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_outlook_0507

_______________________________________________
Exupery mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery

Reply via email to