Dotan Cohen wrote: > Have you seen what fedorafaq.org has done for Fedora? It's all the > same information that is available in Fedora's wiki, but in a Q/A > format on a single page. > > Also, and this may sound rediculous but it's true, having both the > wiki and a seperate FAQ site is two sites supporting f-spot, rather > than one. Even if they have mostly the same information. That's > important for people googling solutions or considering a switch to > fspot. I, for one, have reservations about switching to a product with > very little in the way of online documentation. This will add to the > amount of online documentation resources available to the community.
I think this sounds pretty dangerous. F-spot is a great product, and I don't think having a second artificially created website will make it any more accepted or popular. Also, I think it would be bad to have a FAQ maintained separately from the main website - it would mean that the core contributors would have to log into two places to maintain things. Any time you put documentation in two places, you greatly increase the likelyhood of it going out of sync. However, having a FAQ section/page on the current site would be wonderful, and if you are still interested in doing it, I think that would be great! Warren _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
