On 03/07/06, Stephane Delcroix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ./configure is (almost) the same as ./autogen.sh
I'm daring, and tried ./configure, but it didn't exist! > autogen is meant to be used just after a cvs checkout, configure all the > other times. btw, autogen.sh calls ./configure... so, launch the one you > want. Ok, thanks. I'll stick with ./autogen_sh as I alreay have been using it. > about patching again: don't do that if you sources are already patched. > it will fail miserably... No, each time I rm ~/unstable and ~/development and start over. > you can also try the thing Bengt proposed, but it's not supposed to > happens... > don't worry about asking if it's still wrong, ask again for help. > > I'm happy to help you guys, my wife has not exactly the same views as > yours about the community ant the time spend to develop and > mail :) :) :) but she uses F-Spot too... :) > > rgds, > > Stephane This may sound like a stupid question, but how do I know if make and make install have succeeded? I know that ./autogen_sh succeeded because it says "Now type `make' to compile f-spot". Do make and make install give similar messages? _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
