I've been kind-of looking for a way into f-spot development, but the maintainer activity is a bit low to say the least...
In the meantime I've started to feel that f-spot is a bit behind it's time, with gnome focusing a fair bit on tracker and it's metadata store and all. I've started toying with starting a project using tracker for metadata, including some custom ontologies for storing tag information (such as parent tag, location, etc) if that is not already there. I have no idea of the amount of work to use tracker in this way... There is no emmidiate benefit to using tracker in the short-term though (apart from a few pretty awesome features that are hard to implement in f-spot), so if development were to pick up again, I could probably help with a few patches here and there when I have time :) fre 2011-08-12 klockan 15:32 +0200 skrev Josep Cols: > > On his bye mail, Tomas says than Shotwell is better than f-spot. > > For me, it's not true. I can't migrate to Shotwell because Shotwell has only > 1 level of tags. > > On my collection, I have about 40.000 photos and 2.000 tags: if tags are on a > 'linear' structure, it's very dificult to find the exact tag. > > For me, the tree structure of f-spot tags are a must. > > Thanks for the product and continue the evolution. > > Regards -- Simon Lindgren _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
