Chris Why not let the car builders to the development? I'm sure Don Hanley at Red Deveil will have some nice cannisters, and at very fair prices. The last set of cannisters I bought from him, (nice alum units) were less than $100 each. I cannot remember how much but I remember thinking what a bargain they were.
Chris Eckles wrote: >Hmmmm. A logical reason. . . Now, please note that I wrote the MAC/CRB in >favor of this change. And know nothing of the BOD's reasons. > >But. . . Aside from the one style of "puck canister", currently (only?) >used on the. . . NovaKar? Tie rod goes through the center of the puck, >contained in a cylinder, washers (of variable size?) on either side of the >puck control (Somewhat? Differently?) rebound and compression (?). Aside >from this one design, this change will cost other canister design users. . . >what? A thousand bucks a set all around? That's what it would cost me, and >my guy works cheap. Consider two or three sets to test different designs? > >Don't get me wrong - I am in favor of this. But we ARE talking some serious >money here. Yes, for those that choose to pursue it. . . > >Chris Eckles >Atlanta > > > > >>> If there is a logical reason . . . I think we are "all ears". We're >>> >>> >just >asking for an explanation and waiting, waiting, waiting . . . << [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of jwhit.vcf] ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________ _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
