Charlie, the statement was that the car would more complicated with a bike motor, I know it to be false. The bike motors themselves may be more complicated, but I know for a fact most drivers send the 494's/493's out for rebuilds anyway, so the fact that the 2 cycle is a more simple design, doesn't help it to be more user friendly. CR
"Charlie Schlismann, 71 MiDiv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, Regardless of where one stands on this issue, I can't believe anybody on this list is naiive enough to believe in that statement. Good luck, Charlie Schlismann -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Chris Reinhardt > Why would they not be as simple with bike motors? --------------------------------- Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________ _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
