Maybe I'll do that in the future, but that's taking something simple and making it much, much more complicated. I could remove get-* and only have find-*, but get-* simplifies many XML processing tasks. Also, I don't see how that code deals with namespaces; maybe it just ignores them, but I want this parser to support them. If I removed namespaces and get-*, I'd only have two words. But I want this to be a bit more complete.
On 1/20/07, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Maybe instead of having these words at all, you can implement > something like Scheme's SXPath library: > > http://fawcett.medialab.uwindsor.ca/specs/sxpath/examples.html > > On 20-Jan-07, at 2:01 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote: > > > OK, that seems reasonable, but if I'm renaming > >> - get-name-tag --> tag-named > >> - get-name-tags --> tags-named > >> - find-name-tag --> child-named > >> - find-name-tags --> children-named > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
