On 20-Jan-07, at 2:36 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote: > Maybe I'll do that in the future, but that's taking something simple > and making it much, much more complicated.
I think I'll implement this myself, at some point. > I could remove get-* and > only have find-*, but get-* simplifies many XML processing tasks. No, keep both the get-* and find-*. Now about this naming scheme: get-tag --> rec-tag-named get-tags --> rec-tags-named find-tag --> tag-named find-tags --> tags-named Where the rec- prefix denotes recursive search of all children, not just immediate children. Also, like I said in my earlier e-mail, you can eliminate the distinction between the words which take strings and names by making them generic: GENERIC: tag-named M: string tag-named ... ; M: name tag-named ... ; Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
