Slava Pestov wrote:
> But we already have a shorthand for { [ a ] [ b ] [ c ] } cleave, it's
> [ a ] [ b ] [ c ] tri.
That's still not shorter than:
{ a b c } cleave
It's also not a solution for 4 or more elements.
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
