On Sunday 27 July 2008 13:54:41 Joe Groff wrote:
> I've run into the situation a few times now where I've had "a b c" on
> the stack, and wanted to perform "a c foo" followed by "b c bar"--
> effectively a cleave followed by a spread.
Hi Joe,
Doesn't this also work?
a b c tuck [ foo ] [ bar ] 2bi*
Certain high priests lobbied to have '2bi*' changed to have that 'tuck' be
implicit. I strongly opposed the change; it is not consistent with the
way 'spread' is defined. However I *am* in favor of naming that pattern. So
if someone can come up with a name and a generalization of the concept, it
would be good.
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
