On Sunday 27 July 2008 16:52:29 Slava Pestov wrote: > As far as I can tell, all the usages of 2bi* in core/ and extra/ are > preceded by tuck, so the current 2bi*/2tri*/2cleave behavior is not as > useful as the above would be.
Let's take a look at your reasoning. This is true: > all the usages of 2bi* in core/ and extra/ are preceded by tuck But it does not imply this: > so the current 2bi*/2tri*/2cleave behavior is not as useful as the above would be. In order for the latter to be true, you would have to prove that most of the instances of 2tri* and 2spread are used in the 'spread-with' pattern. But that is impossible because '2tri*' and '2spread' aren't even defined in the core. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
