Hi Jose,

It's pretty cool that you're working on better integration between
Factor and emacs. This might convince me to give emacs a shot one of
these days ;-)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After thinking a bit, my impression is that we don't need for now a
> swank-like protocol to make our emacs listener mode as powerful as slime
> (remote connections can be handled by the tty-server in comint-mode).

What about features like completion of Factor symbols in the buffer
using the dynamic word list in the running instance? You probably want
some kind of protocol for that. Or showing word stack effects for the
word at the point, etc.

Slava

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to