Jeff wrote: > By the way I would be interested if you could do something for me. > > Even if I didn't understood how it work, bake became useful with deep- > cleave-quot. > > But sadly it was send to unmaintained > commit dcea175cd1a742fae49e47fd3ecdcfbf1211544d > "Move bake to unmaintained since it looks like it will be hard to > update; also obj which depends on bake" > > will it be really hard to do ? > > > > Jeff
Hi Jeff, The bake vocabulary was indeed moved to unmaintained. However I believe the plan is to incorporate it's functionality into 'fry'. For your project, I'd recommend sticking with the Factor version you've been using since alot of changes went through recently which impact alot of your code. (Removing *.lib for example). Once the dust settles in the mainline, we can look into updating your code. At the very least, we'll be able to move stuff you depended on into sub-vocabularies (4DNav.namespaces, etc). In the meantime, we might be able to cook up a 'deep-cleave-quot' for ya that doesn't depend on 'bake'. Hang in there. :-) Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
