Recently on #concatenative
[14:40] <swsch> What am I doing wrong: H{ { "a" 1 } } "a" at . ---> f
[14:41] <tizoc> swsch: "a" goes before H{ ... }
[14:42] <tizoc> at's stack effect is ( key assoc -- value/f )
[14:48] <swsch> so ... I'm being stupid, that's ok
[14:48] <swsch> why does "a" implement assoc-protocol?
[14:57] <swsch> ah ... INSTANCE: sequence assoc does it
[14:58] <swsch> but a string is a somewhat strange assoc ... "abc" keys -->
{ 0 0 0 }
[15:00] <swsch> and even funnier 0 "abc" at -> 1 ... what's the idea behind
that?
s.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk