Recently on #concatenative

[14:40]  <swsch> What am I doing wrong:  H{ { "a" 1 } } "a" at .   ---> f
[14:41]  <tizoc> swsch: "a" goes before H{ ... }
[14:42]  <tizoc> at's stack effect is ( key assoc  -- value/f )
[14:48]  <swsch> so ... I'm being stupid, that's ok
[14:48]  <swsch> why does "a" implement assoc-protocol?
[14:57]  <swsch> ah ... INSTANCE: sequence assoc  does it
[14:58]  <swsch> but a string is a somewhat strange assoc ... "abc" keys   --> 
{ 0 0 0 }
[15:00]  <swsch> and even funnier   0 "abc" at  -> 1 ... what's the idea behind 
that?

s.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to