I may be wrong, but I think that sequence is an instance of assoc to make alists work (look at the definition of at*). But yeah, I don't like how interacts with sequences in general.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Schmiedl <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently on #concatenative > > [14:40] <swsch> What am I doing wrong: H{ { "a" 1 } } "a" at . ---> f > [14:41] <tizoc> swsch: "a" goes before H{ ... } > [14:42] <tizoc> at's stack effect is ( key assoc -- value/f ) > [14:48] <swsch> so ... I'm being stupid, that's ok > [14:48] <swsch> why does "a" implement assoc-protocol? > [14:57] <swsch> ah ... INSTANCE: sequence assoc does it > [14:58] <swsch> but a string is a somewhat strange assoc ... "abc" keys > --> { 0 0 0 } > [15:00] <swsch> and even funnier 0 "abc" at -> 1 ... what's the idea > behind that? > > s. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and > around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save > $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. > 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. > Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
