Anton, Any thoughts on this?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Slava Pestov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Anton Gorenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can return .girs back but I don't think that it's a really good idea. >> >> Maybe we should mark these vocabs with 'not loaded' tag? > > The problem with marking them as not loaded is that the build farm > won't test them, and we might end up with a typo that we don't notice > for a long time. How about this. If the .gir is available in the > system-wide location, use that. If not, use a .gir that you ship with > the vocab. That way, on systems that don't have the library installed, > the vocabulary can still load and we can be sure that the .gir parser > works at least. > > Slava > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
