Hi Hugh,
I'd love to see more benchmarks. Feel free to contribute one! Factor is a
lot faster than most dynamic languages because of native compilation,
although on some benchmarks JIT's like PyPy beat us.
Best,
John.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Hugh Aguilar <hughaguila...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> If a comparison in speed is to be made, we need somebody who cares about
> Factor to write the Factor code.
>
> I think Factor is faster than other dynamic-OOP languages (R, Python,
> Ruby, etc.). Realistically however, no dynamic-OOP language is very fast.
> Having tagged data and garbage-collection is just inherently slow.
>
> Dynamic-OOP languages are primarily useful in regard to the code-libraries
> available. R or Python may be very slow, but they do have a lot of
> code-libraries available, especially for displaying data. I could write my
> programs that require speed in Forth and have them dump the raw data into a
> file, then use one of these languages to display the data graphically.
> Right now I display the data in the LowDraw.4th program, but it is just a
> text table --- this doesn't look very professional.
>
> I mostly posted this challenge to find out if Factor is faster than
> SwiftForth. I don't think Factor is going to be anywhere near VFX for
> speed. SwiftForth is very inefficient though --- it would be somewhat
> amusing if a dynamic-OOP language generated faster code than SwiftForth.
>
> Anyway --- benchmark challenges like this aren't very interesting,
> especially when the result is a foregone conclusion --- I just posted it
> because I was curious.
>
> regards --- Hugh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:36:57 -0800
> From: John Benediktsson <mrj...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] benchmark comparing Factor to ANS-Forth
> To: Hugh Aguilar <hughaguila...@yahoo.com>,
> "factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net"
> <factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
> <cakkuuiz1nvonxnofvlc3xeaszfycj+y0ml4qcc22sc9swg4...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Hugh,
>
> Are you planning on implementing your program in Factor for comparison?
>
> You can look over our statistics libraries here:
>
> http://docs.factorcode.org/content/vocab-math.statistics.html
>
> Best,
> John.
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Hugh Aguilar <hughaguila...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > My first-ever ANS-Forth program was LowDraw.4th that was written about
> > 12-15 years ago. It is now one of my example programs in the novice
> > package: http://www.forth.org/novice.html This program does a
> > recursive-traversal of all the possible hands in LowDraw poker given
> > various drawing strategies and calculates the probabilities.
> >
> > The subject of bench-marking has been discussed a few times on
> > comp.lang.forth and I have suggested that my program would make a good
> > benchmark. Most benchmarks involve doing the same simple calculation
> > repeatedly inside of a loop and/or testing what code-library functions
> are
> > available, which provides almost no information about the language speed.
> > My program is non-trivial at the level of a real-world program, but is
> yet
> > simple enough that most programmers should be able to implement it in
> their
> > favorite language over a weekend (note: today is Friday).
> >
> > I think that Factor has a good chance of beating SwiftForth, but is
> > unlikely to come close to VFX (there are free evaluation versions of both
> > available for download). I would be interested in seeing how Factor
> > compares. I would also be interested in seeing how Oforth compares (is
> > Oforth discussed on this forum at all?).
> >
> > I'm learning R right now, and intend to port my program over to R to
> > benchmark R's speed (I'm not expecting R to be very fast). The advantage
> of
> > R seems to be a lot of code-libraries for statistics, and convenient
> > representation of arrays of numbers. Factor's sequences should be equally
> > convenient --- how does Factor compare in regard to code-libraries for
> > statistics? --- I'm trying to learn statistics these days, which is a
> > subject I have always wanted to know more about.
> >
> > I still have my STUNDURD.TXT design of a micro-controller that supports
> > quotations at the machine-language level --- right now you have to have
> me
> > email it to you if you are interested, because thewww.forth.org website
> > is stuck (the guy who maintains it had a stroke) --- afaik, Stundurd
> Forth
> > is an appropriate topic for this forum, as is any Forth-derived language
> > that supports quotations.
> >
> > regards --- Hugh
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
