I think the pairs of {font, string} are cached and only drawn once by the GUI 
framework.
I think you need to call the drawing code more directly to get real performance 
data.

04.06.2019, 07:39, "KUSUMOTO, Norio" <kusum...@na.rim.or.jp>:
> My code was uploaded.
>
> https://github.com/kusumotonorio/factor/blob/win-transparent-background-text/basis/windows/uniscribe/uniscribe.factor
>
> I want to know how slow the code when it draws transparent background
> texts. So I am writing
> a test app to know it. But it has an issue.
> I try to measure time by actually drawing a label with a transparent
> background over and over again, and that happens very quickly.
> Creating an image from text takes a long time (3: and 4:) , so it should
> actually take longer.
> What's wrong with my code?
>
> ! Copyright (C) 2019 KUSUMOTO Norio.
> ! See http://factorcode.org/license.txt for BSD license.
> USING: kernel accessors locals math formatting ui ui.gadgets.labels
> ui.commands ui.gadgets ui.gadgets.toolbar ui.gadgets.tracks ui.gestures
> fonts colors tools.time memory math.ranges namespaces arrays sequences
> windows.uniscribe windows.uniscribe.private ;
> IN: uni-bench
>
> TUPLE: uni-bench-gadget < track
>      opaque-label
>      transparent-label
>      opaque-time
>      transparent-time ;
>
> SYMBOL: test-strings
> V{ } clone test-strings set-global
> 1 5000 [a,b]  [
>      "%04d" sprintf test-strings get push
> ] each
> test-strings get >array test-strings set-global
>
> : <uni-bench-gadget> ( -- gadget )
>      vertical uni-bench-gadget new-track
>       {
>           "  Press any of the keys listed below"
>           ""
>           "    1: Opaque background label (5000 times)"
>           "    2: Transparent background label (5000 times)"
>           "    3: Opaque script-string>image (5000 times)"
>           "    4: Transparent script-string>image (5000 times)"
>           ""
>      } <label> f track-add
>
>      "0000" <label> >>opaque-label
>      "0000" <label> >>transparent-label
>      "" <label> >>opaque-time
>      "" <label> >>transparent-time
>
>      dup opaque-label>>
>      <font>
>      "monospace" >>name
>      T{ rgba f 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 } >>foreground
>      T{ rgba f 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 } >>background
>      36 >>size
>      >>font f track-add
>
>      dup transparent-label>>
>      <font>
>      "monospace" >>name
>      T{ rgba f 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 } >>foreground
>      T{ rgba f 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 } >>background
>      36 >>size
>      >>font f track-add
>
>      dup opaque-time>> " Opaque:" label-on-left f track-add
>      dup transparent-time>> " Transparent:" label-on-left f track-add ;
>
> :: com-benchmark-opaque ( gadget -- )
>      gadget opaque-label>> :> test-label
>      gc
>      [
>          test-strings get-global [
>              test-label swap >>text relayout-1
>          ] each
>      ] benchmark
>      gadget opaque-time>>
>      swap 1000000 / "%d ms" sprintf >>text relayout-1 ;
>
> :: com-benchmark-transparent ( gadget -- )
>      gadget transparent-label>> :> test-label
>      gc
>      [
>          test-strings get-global [
>              test-label swap >>text relayout-1
>          ] each
>      ] benchmark
>      gadget transparent-time>>
>      swap 1000000 / "%d ms" sprintf >>text relayout-1 ;
>
> :: com-benchmark-opaque-script-string>image ( gadget -- )
>      gadget opaque-label>> font>> :> test-font
>      gc
>      [
>          test-strings get-global [
>              test-font swap <script-string> script-string>image drop
>          ] each
>      ] benchmark
>      gadget opaque-time>>
>      swap 1000000 / "%d ms" sprintf >>text relayout-1 ;
>
> :: com-benchmark-transparent-script-string>image ( gadget -- )
>      gadget transparent-label>> font>> :> test-font
>      gc
>      [
>          test-strings get-global [
>              test-font swap <script-string> script-string>image drop
>          ] each
>      ] benchmark
>      gadget transparent-time>>
>      swap 1000000 / "%d ms" sprintf >>text relayout-1 ;
>
> uni-bench-gadget "gestures" f {
>      { T{ key-down { sym "1" } } com-benchmark-opaque }
>      { T{ key-down { sym "2" } } com-benchmark-transparent }
>      { T{ key-down { sym "3" } } com-benchmark-opaque-script-string>image }
>      { T{ key-down { sym "4" } }
> com-benchmark-transparent-script-string>image }
> } define-command-map
>
> M: uni-bench-gadget pref-dim* drop { 300 250 } ;
>
> MAIN-WINDOW: uni-bench { { title "Uniscribe benchmark" } }
>      <uni-bench-gadget> >>gadgets ;
>
> On 2019/05/30 21:17, KUSUMOTO Norio wrote:
>>  Thank you, Alexander! I will read it and study. I tried the idea I
>>  wrote earlier. I've only tried a little, but it seems to work well.
>>  Yay! <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D70GEGkVUAUxgWb.png> -- KUSUMOTO Norio
>>>  2019/05/30 20:19、Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru>のメール: Hello! I
>>>  think I have figured out the algorithm for the image processing. I'm
>>>  not sure if it's the same one that you came up with.
>>>  https://github.com/factor/factor/issues/152#issuecomment-497292323
>>>  Also, I don't know if there are standard WinApi functions to perform
>>>  the necessary operation, namely copying a color channel into the
>>>  alpha channel, but I suspect there might be, in which case we won't
>>>  lose performance there. 30.05.2019, 03:50, "KUSUMOTO Norio"
>>>  <kusum...@na.rim.or.jp>:
>>>>  Although it seems that to transfer the appropriate data to the
>>>>  device context is the 'right' solution, I have a hunch that it will
>>>>  be a difficult task. So I am beginning to think that we should take
>>>>  another, a cheat, approach. It's like a chroma key. Uniscribe draws
>>>>  text with a color background instead of transparency, and a word
>>>>  replaces the color with transparency when converting from the bitmap
>>>>  to an Factor's image. It may be slow, but we don't have many chances
>>>>  to draw characters on a transparent background. And for example, on
>>>>  a button label, once Factor creates an image with such characters,
>>>>  Factor use the image again, so I think there are few problems. This
>>>>  approach can localize changes. I can't define the word for image
>>>>  conversion to do such a special action, but I think that it's not a
>>>>  difficult task for someone familiar with image processing words.
>>>  ---=====--- Александр _______________________________________________
>>>  Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>>  _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing
>>  list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
>>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

---=====--- 
 Александр



_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to