> 2019/06/08 20:04、Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru>のメール:
> 
>  Then I incorporated the optimizations suggested by Jonh Benediktsson, and 
> here are the new results from commit fa57d052:
>  Opaque background: 143 ms
>  Transparent background: 150 ms
> 
>  In general, the Transparent test runs about 6-7 ms longer than the Opaque 
> test, i.e. about 4.6% slower, which is a much better performance 
> characteristic compared to the previous approaches.
> 
>  The updated code is posted here: 
> https://github.com/AlexIljin/factor/tree/win-transparent-text-background


How wonderful!

If it's this fast, it shouldn't be a problem in terms of speed to implement 
imperfectly 
transparent foreground text.

--
KUSUMOTO Norio





_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to