On 12/09/2021 04:01 AM, Nick Howitt via Fail2ban-users wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2021 23:58, H wrote:
>>
>> On December 8, 2021 4:53:02 PM EST, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:42 PM H <age...@meddatainc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am running CentOS 7 and the version of fail2ban available is
>>> 0.11.1, not
>>>> sure what the latest version is. It seems that this version does not
>>>> understand ranges when banning such as in the below example:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can help with the first part... For some reason I get a lot of test
>>> errors with 0.11.2 in EL7 like the below:
>>>
>>> ======================================================================
>>> ERROR: testNewChangeViaGetFailures_move
>>> (fail2ban.tests.filtertestcase.LogFileMonitor)
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "./fail2ban/tests/filtertestcase.py", line 954, in
>>> testNewChangeViaGetFailures_move
>>>     n=14, mode='w')
>>>   File "./fail2ban/tests/filtertestcase.py", line 218, in
>>> _copy_lines_between_files
>>>     fout.write('\n'.join(lines)+'\n')
>>> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\ufffd' in
>>> position 1: ordinal not in range(128)
>>>
>>> If someone can provide a fix I can see about building it. It really
>>> looks
>>> like it's an error with the testing and not with fail2ban proper, but
>>> without knowing for sure I'm hesitant to build it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard
>>
>> Is 0.11.2 the latest version?
>>
> Latest on EPEL is 0.11.2-3. Latest upstream on Github is 0.11.2.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fail2ban-users mailing list
> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Thank you, I updated to 0.11.2-3 and will see if subnet bans stick.



_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Reply via email to