Moses was an Egyptian slave, and Judiasm didn't exist yet.  Jeezus. If you don't know your own history then how can you comment on India's?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 9:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Buddha


--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2005, at 8:45 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
>
> > and that ayurved and sthapatyaved
> > and the six systems of Indian philosphy are a part of what is
> > generally termed  a Vedic tradition.....
>
> First off, I hope you realize that there are several groupings of
the
> Six Darshanas.
>
> You are aware that the original word for "veda" was "agama"?




Lol, then please define what you consider 'Vedic' . Be precise
please. I guess the word 'agni' is not Vedic by your extremist view.
Thats like saying Moses was not a Jew. Of course he wasn't. There
were all sorts of other influences on him. but no-one would say he
was not Jewish.


>
> > Saying that early Buddhism was not Vedic, is like saying that
> > Protestantism is not Christianity.
>
> I'd tend to agree with the Manimekhalai (a Dravidian work) which
(if
> you feel a need to attribute a prior movement to the Dharma)
states
> that Buddhism is derived from Jainism. It also gives, from the
> pre-Vedic perspective, where these six darshanas come from. ALL of
the
> six prophets of these darshanas existed *before the writing of
> Sanskrit.* All of them.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to