> >
> > Damn, shoot her in the head if you have to, but to
> > torture her to death by starvation is really sick.
>
> I don't see it as any more sick than having kept her "alive" on a
> feeding tube for 15+ years.
>
>It may have been discussed before, but, if the girl's parents want
to take charge of her situation, if they want to administer some
kind of therapy, why should they not be allowed to do this. Why
can't the husband simply divorce her and move on. Who cares if she
will ever progress or not. They want to keep her alive. What skin
does the husband need to have in the game at this point. I suspect
it's something other than trying to fulfill her unwritten but
suppossedly expressed wish to not be kept alive in this fashion.
lurk
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
