--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  
> > In a message dated 3/22/05 8:08:59 P.M. Central
> > Standard Time,  
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > 
> > So, why  not let the parents assume guardianship,
> > and care for her as 
> > they  want?  Who exactly is she a burden to - that
> > she deserves to  
> > die.  Do you really believe her husband genuinely
> > cares for  her?
> > 
> > lurk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I have to agree with this point of view. Obviously
> > Michael has  abandoned her 
> > and now has a common law wife with children, not
> > exactly your  devoted loving 
> > husband. Her family loves her and wants to take care
> > of her.  Michael should 
> > lose guardianship just on the basis that he has left
> > her for  another woman.
> 
> That's what I can't figure out either. Why does this
> guy have such a hard-on about having her die? Other
> people are perfectly willing to take care of her. I
> guess legally he speaks for her, not her parents.
> -Peter
> 
I have understood that he then gets her estate, which includes the
bulk of the large medical insurance settlement (over 1-2 million I
believe). Is this correct? -- I have not kept up with all the details.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to