--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > In a message dated 3/22/05 8:08:59 P.M. Central > > Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > So, why not let the parents assume guardianship, > > and care for her as > > they want? Who exactly is she a burden to - that > > she deserves to > > die. Do you really believe her husband genuinely > > cares for her? > > > > lurk > > > > > > > > I have to agree with this point of view. Obviously > > Michael has abandoned her > > and now has a common law wife with children, not > > exactly your devoted loving > > husband. Her family loves her and wants to take care > > of her. Michael should > > lose guardianship just on the basis that he has left > > her for another woman. > > That's what I can't figure out either. Why does this > guy have such a hard-on about having her die? Other > people are perfectly willing to take care of her. I > guess legally he speaks for her, not her parents. > -Peter > I have understood that he then gets her estate, which includes the bulk of the large medical insurance settlement (over 1-2 million I believe). Is this correct? -- I have not kept up with all the details.
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
