On Apr 2, 2005, at 11:58 PM, mark robert wrote:
> In light of your failure to explain yourself, I shall assume that you > are unable to support what you implied: that PET scans indicate that > coke and pot users sustain more brain damage than alcohol users. > > I never said that coke and pot users sustain more brain damage than alcohol users. Anything that effects cerebral perfusion will be reflected in a PET scan using FDG, a tracer which shows how the brain uses these fine sugars. For example, this is used in meditation research to show changes to the brain. Don't you know how to use a search engine? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
