> ---You keep saying this. I am suffering, always. Always. I go from
thing to thing always wanting more.

Rory:
Bingo! Only "I" is suffering; the rest is a mirror. But actually,
no "I" don't. That is Self (or non-self if you prefer) believing it
is the dream, believing it is self, the ego, some thought/feeling or
other; that which changes. When we impose some condition on what IS,
we suffer.
 
---Yeah

RudraJoe:
>When I'm hungry I feel weak.

Rory:
Yes, when the body is hungry it feels weak. So?
----Yeah, So share people share.

RudraJoe:
>When I run out of weed my mind gets really pitta and feels like
exploding.  Like now.

Rory:
Yes, the mind feels like exploding. So?
 
----So share people share.

RudraJoe:
>No suffering? Good for you. The suffering I feel is the source of
my desire for liberation.

Rory:
How the hell can you desire what you already ARE? Fool! :-)
 
----Yeah, that which is hungry desires food. That which is suffering desires freedom from suffering. Life is desire, no desire is no life. Nirvana. That which feels nothing goes on.

RudraJoe:
>And always was. The fact of constant change makes all relative
solutions invalid.

Rory:
Bingo. So? Why keep on identifying with them then? Obviously
attempting to identify with impermanence causes suffering. Nature's
way of telling us we are thinking something incorrect, something
which IS not.
 
----Nature delights in diversity, and impermanence. The only thing nature is telling me is to score.

RudraJoe:
>Sure, I absolutely don't suffer, as when I stepped out of time when
my father died. But karmically speaking, I have been caught up in
suffering since I entered the womb and every day and moment since
then.

Rory:
Yes, constantly identifying with the movie of one's own projecting.
Suffering.
 
....

RudraJoe:
>Except when I was fucked up or in samadhi. But my guess is also
that if you were you wouldn't be asking vapid questions. 

Rory:
I am here because I have absolutely nothing better to do than to
better Understand You, and so to better Understand mySelf.
 
----But you're not helping me so much as words don't bring home the bacon. Except sometimes.

RudraJoe:
>If we understand that we are the Absolute then can we understand
that someone must cook and someone must wash dishes. Otherwise, no
cooking, no eating, much suffering.

Rory:
Still drawing a distinction between Absolute and Relative. Both just
concepts. What IS, is neither Absolute nor Relative -- isn't it?
 
----Yeah, some good points.

RudraJoe:
>Heaven on Earth is right now, as I have always maintained, but
being relative heaven must also change and so is not a solution to
misery.

Rory:
Can't pin our "oughts" and shoulds" on anything; that way lies
madness. Relative is just a concept. Inside and outside, self and
other are just concepts. Believing in concepts implies suffering.
 
----Believing in concepts implies a mind not in touch with the Ground of Being.

RudraJoe:
Nonetheless, heaven must be served, how do you take yours?  I would
be glad to hook it up if I could.

Rory:
Love you, Kirk! Thanks for trying so hard. I do appreciate it. We
already are what we're striving for; we just forget sometimes.
 
----I remember, but I have soo much energy that I'm going berserk with it. Thanks for being so vast.

Your Buddha-buddy :-)
 
Likewise.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to