|
> ---You keep saying this. I am suffering, always. Always. I go from thing to thing always wanting more. Rory: Bingo! Only "I" is suffering; the rest is a mirror. But actually, no "I" don't. That is Self (or non-self if you prefer) believing it is the dream, believing it is self, the ego, some thought/feeling or other; that which changes. When we impose some condition on what IS, we suffer. ---Yeah
RudraJoe: >When I'm hungry I feel weak. Rory: Yes, when the body is hungry it feels weak. So? ----Yeah, So share
people share.
RudraJoe: >When I run out of weed my mind gets really pitta and feels like exploding. Like now. Rory: Yes, the mind feels like exploding. So? ----So share people
share.
RudraJoe: >No suffering? Good for you. The suffering I feel is the source of my desire for liberation. Rory: How the hell can you desire what you already ARE? Fool! :-) ----Yeah, that
which is hungry desires food. That which is suffering desires freedom from
suffering. Life is desire, no desire is no life. Nirvana. That which feels
nothing goes on.
RudraJoe: >And always was. The fact of constant change makes all relative solutions invalid. Rory: Bingo. So? Why keep on identifying with them then? Obviously attempting to identify with impermanence causes suffering. Nature's way of telling us we are thinking something incorrect, something which IS not. ----Nature delights
in diversity, and impermanence. The only thing nature is telling me is to
score.
RudraJoe: >Sure, I absolutely don't suffer, as when I stepped out of time when my father died. But karmically speaking, I have been caught up in suffering since I entered the womb and every day and moment since then. Rory: Yes, constantly identifying with the movie of one's own projecting. Suffering. ....
RudraJoe: >Except when I was fucked up or in samadhi. But my guess is also that if you were you wouldn't be asking vapid questions. Rory: I am here because I have absolutely nothing better to do than to better Understand You, and so to better Understand mySelf. ----But you're not
helping me so much as words don't bring home the bacon. Except
sometimes.
RudraJoe: >If we understand that we are the Absolute then can we understand that someone must cook and someone must wash dishes. Otherwise, no cooking, no eating, much suffering. Rory: Still drawing a distinction between Absolute and Relative. Both just concepts. What IS, is neither Absolute nor Relative -- isn't it? ----Yeah, some good
points.
RudraJoe: >Heaven on Earth is right now, as I have always maintained, but being relative heaven must also change and so is not a solution to misery. Rory: Can't pin our "oughts" and shoulds" on anything; that way lies madness. Relative is just a concept. Inside and outside, self and other are just concepts. Believing in concepts implies suffering. ----Believing in
concepts implies a mind not in touch with the Ground of
Being.
RudraJoe: Nonetheless, heaven must be served, how do you take yours? I would be glad to hook it up if I could. Rory: Love you, Kirk! Thanks for trying so hard. I do appreciate it. We already are what we're striving for; we just forget sometimes. ----I remember, but
I have soo much energy that I'm going berserk with it. Thanks for being so
vast.
Your Buddha-buddy :-) Likewise. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Guts rudra_joe
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Guts Rory Goff
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mah... Rick Archer
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra Rory Goff
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra rudra_joe
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra off_world_beings
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra johnlasher20002000
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra jim_flanegin
- [FairfieldLife] Re: My Dinner with Dr. Mahapatra shukra69
