Here's my take on this. The father is a very controlling man. He develops a possessive emotional attachment to his daughter, and is jealous when she starts to form friendships with boys. She resents this, and plots to get back at him and free herself. Being immature (naturally, at that age), she thinks that making a false accusation of sexual abuse will get him to back off. She doesn't think through the consequences, and the lie, like all lies, acquires a life of its own. She is frightened by the storm she has unleashed and digs in by sticking to her story. He is genuinely astonished by her accusation but can do nothing to prove she is lying, just as she can do nothing to prove she is telling the truth.
I just hope I don't get called for jury duty for the third trial, if there is one. --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 4/19/05 8:32 PM, easyone200 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> Not to my understanding. The molestations were occurring as many as 5 times > >> a week. For how long? > > > > I guess that makes it OK then, he wasn't drunk and by your logic if it was 5 > > times a week > > she was into it. > > 5 times a week, yet the doctor who examined her said it was unclear that she > had ever had sex, and her father had been diagnosed with erectile > dysfunction. Seems fishy. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
