--- In [email protected], "sadhak108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Bob Brigante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sadhak108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Bob Brigante" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > From one hour and 10 mins on during the mou.org press conference > > of > > > > 13Apr2005, MMY says some interesting things about the sound of > > the > > > > Vedas and also Prahlad, the kid who was a devotee of Ram despite > > his > > > > father's disapproval: > > > > > > > > > > Prahlada was an Asura whose devotion to _Vishnu_ was unwavering. > > His father was > > > Hiranyakashipu (sp). Prahlada was sent to Shukra (Venus, preceptor > > of Demons) to wean > > > the bhakti out of him. > > > He was unable to do so and the moment his father was about to kill > > him, Narasimha > > > avatar(Vishnu) comes out to the pillar and rips Hiranyakashipu's > > guts out. > > > Prahalada became king and a very good one at that. > > > > > > Hari Om Tat Sat > > > > MMY at one hour and 10 mins and following in the 13Apr2005 press > > conference http://streaming.mou.org/MOU/Apr/wnews_13apr2005_128.ram , > > compares the TM movement to Prahlad: just as Prahlad could not say > > that Ram is limited in any way and therefore he could not deny that > > Ram/Vishnu was in the pillar http://www.answers.com/topic/narasimha , > > the Vedic Pundits and people practicing TM are associating themselves > > with the Natural Law of omnipresent universal consciousness, and > > therefore will prevail in their interaction with an ignorant world. > >
> Although it may seem nitpicking..as all is Vishnu. But this reasserts that Mahesh Yogi does > not accurately disperse knowledge. If he is saying Prahlada refers to Rama, then it is > incorrect as the story is about Narsimha avataara and not Ram. Hiranyakashipu slain by > Narasimha and his brother Hiranyayaksha was slain by Varaha (Boar) Vishnu avatara. In > Treta Yuga (Rama's) they incarnated as Dasakantha(Ravana) and his brother Kumbakharna. > They were very close to Vishnu and had been cursed. > > "A little knowledge is dangerous" said Mahesh Yogi. ********** That's a remarkably ignorant remark about the relationship of Ram and Vishnu, who happen to be one and the same and because the Ram avatar and Vishnu are one and the same, all the avatars of Vishnu are Ram or take your pick, they are all Vishnu or Krishna http://www.kidsfreesouls.com/Ram.htm (you clearly are dedicated to proving MMY's point about the danger of a little knowledge): 94-98 Ravana consults with his Grandsire 98-100 He tells Ravana that Ram is Vishnu 100-104 King Maya and Ravana meet and he tells Ravana that Ram is Vishnu 104-105 Ravana's mother tells him that Ram is Vishnu http://mailer.fsu.edu/~kerndl/page19.htm More importantly, you are missing the point that Ram/Vishnu are omnipresent as the universal consciousness, which is what Prahlad had to say, and his pop found out when the lion guy popped out of the pillar. Devotion to God is regularity of practice of TM which allows one to align oneself with that universal consciousness. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
