--- In [email protected], "Bob Brigante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sadhak108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: <snip> > > > Ram/Vishnu was in the pillar > http://www.answers.com/topic/narasimha , > > > the Vedic Pundits and people practicing TM are associating > themselves > > > with the Natural Law of omnipresent universal consciousness, and > > > therefore will prevail in their interaction with an ignorant > world. > > > > > > > > Although it may seem nitpicking..as all is Vishnu. But this > reasserts that Mahesh Yogi does > > not accurately disperse knowledge. If he is saying Prahlada refers > to Rama, then it is > > incorrect as the story is about Narsimha avataara and not Ram. > Hiranyakashipu slain by > > Narasimha and his brother Hiranyayaksha was slain by Varaha (Boar) > Vishnu avatara. In > > Treta Yuga (Rama's) they incarnated as Dasakantha(Ravana) and his > brother Kumbakharna. > > They were very close to Vishnu and had been cursed. > > > > "A little knowledge is dangerous" said Mahesh Yogi. > > ********** > > That's a remarkably ignorant remark about the relationship of Ram and > Vishnu, who happen to be one and the same and because the Ram avatar > and Vishnu are one and the same, all the avatars of Vishnu are Ram or > take your pick, they are all Vishnu or Krishna > http://www.kidsfreesouls.com/Ram.htm (you clearly are dedicated to > proving MMY's point about the danger of a little knowledge): > > 94-98 Ravana consults with his Grandsire > 98-100 He tells Ravana that Ram is Vishnu > 100-104 King Maya and Ravana meet and he tells Ravana that Ram is > Vishnu > 104-105 Ravana's mother tells him that Ram is Vishnu > http://mailer.fsu.edu/~kerndl/page19.htm > > More importantly, you are missing the point that Ram/Vishnu are > omnipresent as the universal consciousness, which is what Prahlad had > to say, and his pop found out when the lion guy popped out of the > pillar. Devotion to God is regularity of practice of TM which allows > one to align oneself with that universal consciousness.
Where did I say Ram was not Vishnu? In fact my opening statement > > Although it may seem nitpicking..as all is Vishnu. Your points above about Ram have nothing to do with Prahlada's story. Can you tell me where Prahlada mentions Ram's name? Of course they are the same. My point was TMO leader's spin on the story. Which is just another in the long line of spins. Hari Om Tat Sat (All is Hari) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
