Good question. Again, it depends on the lens. From the Solar-system
viewpoint, we can see the Earth as occupying the system's Solar
Plexus. Other energies are also involved; it looks as if the Sirian
system is exerting much more direct influence over the Solar System
than previously. I believe Sirius mediates most of the Galactic
energies for our Solar System. The galactic energies I am most
familiar with are Pleaidean, and these energies too are apparently
becoming more and more tangible. It may well be that the earth
herself is actually coming out of quarantine to rejoin the Universe,
a kind of global correlate to "Brahman consciousness." Evidence
certainly points in this direction; this would correlate to
Llundrub's statement about the earth's causal body dissolving.



----I see a good bit of Theosophy in your explication, particularly Alice Bailey and her focus on the Pleades. I cannot say that the Pleades have any greater effect than any other stars upon the Earth.  The reason I said that the Earth's causal body was dissolving was because the whole natural and ecological food chain which kept organic life on Earth semi-orderly is being destroyed so that simple cause and effect can no longer be relied upon.
 
The Brahman thing confuses me intellectually. It makes no sense too express oneself in terms of all things that are as if the limited personality can function in that manner. No offense Rory, but I think this is a mistake of the intellect for you. 
 
On the other hand, to say that one is one with the stream of life, or of the essence of all, or a micro of the macro, or even one is nothing at all, but contains everything, these are more rationally sound expressions to me, as we are existing in time and space, even though not of it.  To identify with a purview of some galactic being is rather stilting as regards ones personal choices. Ie., how can doing anything have any value in the cosmic scheme of things as in a universe or multiverse of endless choices even the fate of this small planet is unimportant, let alone what to make for dinner. Of course, if you had absolutely no  desires at all whatsoever then it would be ok holding this purview as everything that came ones way would be just wonderful. But as long as we have personal desires we must not take some slinky absolutist view of our condition lest looking into the abyss it look back into us. If one hadn't had their limited and limiting human conditioning and training then a galactic or cosmic stance also would have no meaning, so therefore also such conceptions are false and conditioned. Finally since a cosmic purview is still a purview, that means it is a conditioned and limited view. Only no view at all is unconditioned and truely of the essence.  So I find it actually inhuman and mistaken to say and think such things as that everything exists in ME. 
 
Sure, as an unbounded self one is the same beyond all changing things and so as things change so also one can say that they have changed, as illusory as that change may be. 
 
But as noted Brahman consciousness was not a terminolgy used by any Vedic or tantric practitioner prior to its British popularization, which was probably just a sardonic slur in the beginning. Nonetheless, Maharishi has defined his Brahman consciousness as the ability to hold three deep levels of objects in the transcendent consciousness through all phases of life. This still implies some relativism as Maharishi's BC is not a galactic awareness though it's an awareness of the sameness of all phenomenon, regardless of time or place but still limited to time and place.
 
My point is that I find it confusing to have someone say to me that everything is an _expression_ of them. It sets up a polarity that cannot be overcome in language and far from teaching others the truth it rather relativises it and baffles them.  If I am confused then I stake my own case. Moreover, how do the Pleades take their eggs this morning?


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to