Thanks! beautiful story!

--- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MMY used to come to Norway and lead summercourses in teh beginning 
of 
> his Movement. The audience once asked him the question: "Are you 
> Messiah". The answer was "Yes". Next question was: "Why don't you 
> tell people that you are Messiah". He answered: "I do not want to 
be 
> hanged in a tree".
> (The source is an old TM-Teacher that participated the Course).
> Ingegerd 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > Then there's the US Hindu community. The tmo is, even now, 
> > endeavoring to contact all the wealthy members of this community 
> and 
> > convince them to sponsor vedic pundits in India to do yagyas for 
> > them in perpetuity.
> > 
> > It goes one way at one time, and the opposite at another. So it 
> > seems that these kinds of decisions are tactical and without an 
> > overriding strategy or ideology.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Vaj wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > Mahesh repeatedly refused to teach to the 
> > > > > English Hindu community. Isn't it obvious why?
> > > 
> > > Well, actually, two contradictory explanations 
> > > explain why MMY doesn't chase after expatriate 
> > > Indians. One is the explanation you imply, Vaj - 
> > > that they'll see the holes in his teaching.
> > > 
> > > The other explanation is that MMY is restoring 
> > > knowledge that's been corrupted, and that people 
> > > who've built their lives around the "old" teaching 
> > > are unlikely to embrace the new. To do so would 
> > > be to admit their beliefs have been lies.
> > > 
> > > Now, what I've just said is the party line, but I can't 
> > > illustrate it with specific examples of teachings in 
> > > classical Hinduism that Maharishi rejects. Is there 
> > > such a case?
> > > 
> > > By the way, the classic example of the second 
> > > explanation is in Christ's career. He chased after 
> > > Jews for two years before getting wise to the fact 
> > > that they didn't want something new. Only when 
> > > he ministered to an entirely new market, the gentiles, 
> > > did his teaching take off.
> > > 
> > >  - Patrick Gillam
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On May 10, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Llundrub wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > The irony is that Maharishi has 559 thousand Hindus or 
> peeps 
> > of 
> > > > his 
> > > > > > own faith who he is letting down.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "It seems significant that Maharishi did not minister to 
the 
> > more 
> > > > > knowledgeable �migr� Indian community in London, but 
instead 
> > > > > concentrated on Westerners, that probably could not tell a 
> > bogus 
> > > > yogi 
> > > > > from a real one."
> > > > > 
> > > > > -review of "Call No Man Master"
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mahesh repeatedly refused to teach to the English Hindu 
> > community. 
> > > > > Isn't it obvious why?>>>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Bullshit. He did teach them. They were respectful but not 
that 
> > > > interested generally.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to