4 questions that I would like answers for if MMY is the Messiah.
(1) What does that make Guru Dev?
(2) Does that equate the Sidhas with the 144,000 witnesses?
(3) Jesus liked women, and surrounded himself with them, what happened since then
(4) Messiah is a Jewish idea, so where is Israel in this?
----- Original Message -----
From: Ingegerd
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Bye bye Brits/Scorpions Need Nectar

MMY used to come to Norway and lead summercourses in teh beginning of
his Movement. The audience once asked him the question: "Are you
Messiah". The answer was "Yes". Next question was: "Why don't you
tell people that you are Messiah". He answered: "I do not want to be
hanged in a tree".
(The source is an old TM-Teacher that participated the Course).
Ingegerd


--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Then there's the US Hindu community. The tmo is, even now,
> endeavoring to contact all the wealthy members of this community
and
> convince them to sponsor vedic pundits in India to do yagyas for
> them in perpetuity.
>
> It goes one way at one time, and the opposite at another. So it
> seems that these kinds of decisions are tactical and without an
> overriding strategy or ideology.
>
> --- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Vaj wrote:
> >
> > > > Mahesh repeatedly refused to teach to the
> > > > English Hindu community. Isn't it obvious why?
> >
> > Well, actually, two contradictory explanations
> > explain why MMY doesn't chase after expatriate
> > Indians. One is the explanation you imply, Vaj -
> > that they'll see the holes in his teaching.
> >
> > The other explanation is that MMY is restoring
> > knowledge that's been corrupted, and that people
> > who've built their lives around the "old" teaching
> > are unlikely to embrace the new. To do so would
> > be to admit their beliefs have been lies.
> >
> > Now, what I've just said is the party line, but I can't
> > illustrate it with specific examples of teachings in
> > classical Hinduism that Maharishi rejects. Is there
> > such a case?
> >
> > By the way, the classic example of the second
> > explanation is in Christ's career. He chased after
> > Jews for two years before getting wise to the fact
> > that they didn't want something new. Only when
> > he ministered to an entirely new market, the gentiles,
> > did his teaching take off.
> >
> >  - Patrick Gillam
> >
> > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On May 10, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Llundrub wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The irony is that Maharishi has 559 thousand Hindus or
peeps
> of
> > > his
> > > > > own faith who he is letting down.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "It seems significant that Maharishi did not minister to the
> more
> > > > knowledgeable �migr� Indian community in London, but instead
> > > > concentrated on Westerners, that probably could not tell a
> bogus
> > > yogi
> > > > from a real one."
> > > >
> > > > -review of "Call No Man Master"
> > > >
> > > > Mahesh repeatedly refused to teach to the English Hindu
> community.
> > > > Isn't it obvious why?>>>
> > >
> > >
> > > Bullshit. He did teach them. They were respectful but not that
> > > interested generally.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to