--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Robert Parks piece on Hagelin and TM was entirely devoid of any > > reasoning, logic, or corroborative findings, to support Park's > > incredibly prejudiced, unreasoned, and fundamentalist(ie : closed > > minded) skeptic approach. It was utter unscientific prejudiced > > personal opinion. > > It seemed like a reasonable skepticism given the incredibly > prejudiced, unreasoned, and fundamentalist proposition that Hagelin > made. Are you still living in a hall of mirrors?>>
No it wasn't . Only to an irrational mind with no need for a reasoned discussion in order to affirm their fundamentalist unsubstantiated views. Your last sentance is typical of such unfocused intellects with fundamentalist ideals. They always resort to insult because they know no reason. Just like fundamentalist Christians you can't look at the fallacy of your reasoning because you are simply convinced that you are right no matter what. You and GW Bush buddy. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
