Now whether we want all of the answers explained and available up
front or whether we are content to let us be led to them as we need
them seems purely a matter of personal preference, don't you think?
 
No, I went to MIU to become enlightened. And though I had good samadhi, even during the SCI, who's patent point of existing is to teach enlightenment, there was no enlightenment. And then when we studied Vedic Science when I would ask too probing a question the teachers would tell me to sit down. If enlightenment had existed anywhere in the Movement then it could have been explained or pointed out. Especially when it came to the Vedic Cognition and Vedanga Cognition courses. If someone had had greater knowledge like Geoffrey Wells or Mario Orsatti then they could have truely enlightened and led during those moments but those opportunities were wasted and so was my education. For all it's touting of teaching the container of all knowledge all that really is at MUM is a deeper level of confusion than in the regular world, or the knowledge would be considered so precious that people would have supported MUM to their deaths. Supreme instruction is that compassionate and that profound. I would die for my teachers. Gladly.


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to