--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "oneradiantbeing" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know (Greens have 
2nd 
> thoughts) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/1902088/posts
> 
> Georgia Green Party | May 25, 2007 | Richard Searcy
> 
> Posted on 09/25/2007 4:28:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
> 
> Republican Presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul is making a 
> name for himself by emerging as an antiwar republican in the 2008 
> race for the White House. While those of us who oppose the mindless 
> war in Iraq welcome all voices of opposition, there are some 
> troubling questions arising about Mr. Paul. 
> 
> Paul has been consistent in his opposition to the war, but he 
hasn't 
> been very vocal or visible about that opposition. Most Americans 
knew 
> nothing about Mr. Paul before this election season or had no idea 
> that such an animal as an antiwar republican even existed. Where 
was 
> he years ago when his voice of opposition would not only have been 
> more appreciated, it would have been much more beneficial to this 
> nation, before being antiwar was popular and carried far more 
> political risks. 
> 
> Being that he's an antiwar republican, which makes him somewhat of 
an 
> anomaly, surely he could have found and exploited opportunities to 
be 
> more vocal and visible with his stance. There were other 
politicians 
> such as, Cynthia McKinney, Paul Wellstone, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph 
> Nader, and others who were known for their opposition to the war. 
Why 
> didn't Mr. Paul stand with any of them? Why didn't he appear at 
> antiwar demonstrations or stand with other non-politicians who were 
> against the war? >>>

Idiot. He railed against it in Congress before the war, far stronger 
than ANYONE else.

The rest of this rant is like saying Obama is a Muslim 
fundamentalist, and black suprematist.

OffWorld

Reply via email to