--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "oneradiantbeing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know (Greens have 2nd > thoughts) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/1902088/posts > > Georgia Green Party | May 25, 2007 | Richard Searcy > > Posted on 09/25/2007 4:28:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet > > Republican Presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul is making a > name for himself by emerging as an antiwar republican in the 2008 > race for the White House. While those of us who oppose the mindless > war in Iraq welcome all voices of opposition, there are some > troubling questions arising about Mr. Paul. > > Paul has been consistent in his opposition to the war, but he hasn't > been very vocal or visible about that opposition. Most Americans knew > nothing about Mr. Paul before this election season or had no idea > that such an animal as an antiwar republican even existed. Where was > he years ago when his voice of opposition would not only have been > more appreciated, it would have been much more beneficial to this > nation, before being antiwar was popular and carried far more > political risks. > > Being that he's an antiwar republican, which makes him somewhat of an > anomaly, surely he could have found and exploited opportunities to be > more vocal and visible with his stance. There were other politicians > such as, Cynthia McKinney, Paul Wellstone, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph > Nader, and others who were known for their opposition to the war. Why > didn't Mr. Paul stand with any of them? Why didn't he appear at > antiwar demonstrations or stand with other non-politicians who were > against the war? >>>
Idiot. He railed against it in Congress before the war, far stronger than ANYONE else. The rest of this rant is like saying Obama is a Muslim fundamentalist, and black suprematist. OffWorld