Off, You know I have not had much positivity for your actions here, but yesterday, and you KNOW I hate to admit this, you were cogent, right on, clear, and "good reading" in several posts and parts of posts. So much so, that I almost replied with a big thumbs up, but then just as I was about to do so, another of your posts came wherein you "lost it" and began the kicking and screaming lashing out toddler stuff.
With so many here trying to bite their tongues, sticking to the good stuff and forgetting the blurry, I am getting high on the good vibes coming on strongly here. Suddenly everyone is trying to be nice and trying to contribute, ya know? You included. So, even if Rick bans you for a week, come on back and do that good stuff again. One of the things I love/hate most about this venue is that the people who negatively trigger me will, with unbearable regularity, prove my opinion of them to be far too cartoonish and not nearly as complex as they deserve. You are a human being, Off, and to the extent that I judge you as lacking, let it be known that that opinion is merely my own inability to make lemonade out of "you" and thus my own mirror I look into. And the other day, the astronomers found this "very brief flash" of radio waves in their data. A new thingy for them. Don't know quite yet what it was -- maybe a black hole exploding or two neutron stars colliding, but it was over in "a flash." Sooooooooo, when I first starting posting here, I ripped you a new one for being so stupid as to think you'd seen a supernova, I was not taking into consideration that, hard as it is to imagine, you may have seen a very rare event -- never recorded by science before. Not a supernova, but something else....something way fast. That said, the radio burst was not visible to the human eye, so the incident I'm mentioning could not have been the one that "happened" to you. But, still, as an olive branch, let me say in public that maybe there are events out there that are flashy in the visible spectrum. Maybe you should find an astronomer, tell him/her where you were looking and when, and maybe he'll be able to search the data and see what you saw! So, bite your tongue there dude. You know that I have a sore one, right? And I'm have a far deeper rage addiction, so if I can, so can you. Edg --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Bronte Baxter > <brontebaxter8@> wrote: > > > > That flaming Scottsman Off-World wrote: > > It is clear what Ron Paul stands for, and that he will never be a > dictator as you are trying to make out. He does not have that sort of > energy, nor the charisma, to be a dictator. You're fearmongering is > laughable, and will go nowhere. It is a joke and you are making a > > fool of yourself. > > _ > > Bronte: > > > > Now doggone it, Off, here you're doing the VERY thing you just > told me was blatantly unfair: saying "your argument is stupid because > it's stupid, and you are stupid to boot." You are accusing others of > the thing you yourself have just turned around and done. You're hurt > and lashing out. It's time to stop and be > civil. > > > > > Yawn. (I'm hurt and lashing out..ROTFL ! ) > Anyone with a rational mind would see it for that, a rational > response to an insane irrational rant the purpose of which is to > smear someone (Ron Paul in this case) > > Go back and answer the points I made in reply to you in the other > post instead of avoiding them. > > Since when are lies about a person (Ron Paul) a form of discourse? > > What do you do the rest of the day when not scolding people for being > naughty boys on the internet? > > OffWorld >
