--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Off, > > Go here for that article: http://tinyurl.com/29ushb > > As for being insulted etc., well, as you can see by my own travail > here that there's no profit in it. It just ends up as a shouting > match that serves no one, and in my case, lowers my integrity even > when I spew my very best epithets with Shakespearean verve -- no > matter how creative my writing, I end up being the only one besmirched > thereby. > > Give it up, Off. It's a burden only you think is worth carrying. > That's what I did, and I'm a lot better for it -- no angst to have to > defend; >>>
You don't seem to get it. I am not the one flaming. Re-read my post to understand that flaming comes in much more subtle and sinister forms, and they should be addressed and dealt with. It has to do with arrogant people saying things they would not dare to say to my face, and then expecting me to be all nicey nicey to them. No way. It is also damaging to them for others to not deal with it. If one wants to spend a lot of time analyzing why someone would troll the internet for the sole purpose of making people angry, it would be rather time consuming. <<piss-ants require nothing more than simple indifference to > their jibes, and, hey, you get to actually interact with folks here > without, you know, pain. > > Try it. I'm just saying.>> Ok, I'll try it. OffWorld > > I pretty much stopped telling Rick about flamers smacking me, but > others are notifying him "for me." And, then, if need be, I report > flamers of them. Neat!!! One is thus no longer a whiny baby, but > instead is a White Knight defending the honor of others. I love the > illusion's packaging of sublimations. > > Edg > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Off, > > > > > > You know I have not had much positivity for your actions here, but > > > yesterday, and you KNOW I hate to admit this, you were cogent, right > > > on, clear, and "good reading" in several posts and parts of posts. > > So > > > much so, that I almost replied with a big thumbs up, but then just > > as > > > I was about to do so, another of your posts came wherein you "lost > > it" > > > and began the kicking and screaming lashing out toddler stuff.>> > > > > > > Actually its kicking and screaming and lashing out like a grown up > > man, but hey, that's just the real world. > > > > Someone says the cowardly stuff they say to me here, but face to face > > in the real world, it would be an interesting interaction of form, > > rhythm, movement, angle, momentum, collision, and vector fractals > > that would result. > > > > > > > > > > With so many here trying to bite their tongues, sticking to the good > > > stuff>> > > > > But they are not. They are incredibly rude and hateful. It never > > ends. If someone says to me, as qntpkt, who started this whole thing > > said, that I am wrong because I am wrong and don't what I am talking > > about, it is absolutely no difference from saying : "You are [EMAIL > > PROTECTED] #&ing > > moronic turd OffWorld" . And then that same person says that he > > deliberatley trolls the internet trying to get people angry by > > engaging them in combative irrational and useless arguments for the > > sole puropose of getting them angery, then I think the person should > > be banned. I do not believe in backing down to such a low-life > > attitude. It only encourages them to become more of that. > > > > > > > > And the other day, the astronomers found this "very brief flash" of > > > radio waves in their data. A new thingy for them. Don't know quite > > > yet what it was -- maybe a black hole exploding or two neutron stars > > > colliding, but it was over in "a flash." Sooooooooo, when I first > > > starting posting here, I ripped you a new one for being so stupid as > > > to think you'd seen a supernova, I was not taking into consideration > > > that, hard as it is to imagine, you may have seen a very rare > > event -- never recorded by science before. Not a supernova, but > > something else....something way fast.>> > > > > And I remember at the time that I predicted that within one year you > > people here would hear scientists talking about such an event. (I > > could look back in the posts to find that prediction , but it would > > take too long right now.) > > > > Thanks for bringing this up though, much appreciated. Where did you > > read it? > > > > Note: to anyone I have not answered a post yet, it is just I have > > been too busy, but will do so soon.) > > > > OffWorld > > >
