jim_flanegin wrote:
> I don't know what the ideal government looks like, though I like the
> matrix management idea. I see the relationship of what we do here
> and consciousness very much like a thermometer (level of
> consciousness) superimposed upon the earth and all of the human
> activities. Only certain activities, structures and elements are
> available for any given consciousness 'temperature'. As the
> consciousness temperature rises, life improves. I don't know what
> that process ultimately looks like, or what the timeframes are. I am
> just now seeing that relationship clearly and dynamically. As for
> predicting the global future, all I can do is predict the nature of
> my own future and that of those close to me. That being said, I
> don't see any global cataclysm in my lifetime, or my chidren's
> lifetime, or my grandchildren's lifetime. Going forward, it is
> looking better than worse.:-)
>
Hewlett-Parkard used matrix management and everyone who was there at the
time was happy with it. We tried it at our company but it failed
because we had the wrong group structures to make it work. To me,
"laissez faire capitalism" introduces too much entropy into the system.
Well we can hope we don't see any great cataclysm but a cataclysm could
also well be living under a tyranny.
