Personally I stay out of the water around any beaches north of the 
Golden Gate, and south of Seacliff...too many great whites in the 
water around here, especially stinson beach to pt.reyes area and 
down around watsonville. Also avoid early morning and dusk, aka 
feeding time. :-)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Humboldt County has the highest number of unprovoked shark attacks 
in 
> California but even so, the total number is only 12 since 1926
> (including this latest) and none of them were fatal.  Most, if not 
> all, of the shark attacks are presumed to have been accidental 
taste-
> testing by sharks who mistook the silhouette of the board with the 
> surfers' arms and legs dangling to be either big seals or sea 
turtles 
> which are their normal diet.  Apparently humans don't have the 
same 
> calorie-rich composition that sharks require and after the first 
bite 
> they move on in search of something worth sinking their teeth into.
> 
> This particular shark, based on the size of the bite, was 
estimated 
> to be 16 feet long and approximately 3000 lbs.  
> 
> Gulp...
> 
> **
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 2, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Marek Reavis wrote:
> > 
> > > Yesterday morning, during the trial calendar call, another 
public
> > > defender and long time surfer asked if I'd heard about the 
woman 
> whose
> > > board got bitten the other day at a break I go to a lot, 
Moonstone
> > > Beach (I was just there Sunday, but it was all mush so I 
didn't go
> > > out).  This morning the news finally made it to the local 
> newspapers
> > > but another, better version of the event from a Norcal surf 
site 
> can be
> > > found at
> > >
> > > http://www.surfline.com/surfnews/article_bamp.cfm?id=11376
> > >
> > > Nothing like a good dose of the heebie-jeebies to take your 
mind 
> off
> > > the current tempest in a teapot.
> > 
> > Better the board than the person.   Must have tasted awful.
> > 
> > Sal
> >
>


Reply via email to